Movie Review ~ May December

The Facts:

Synopsis: Twenty years after their notorious tabloid romance gripped the nation, a married couple buckles under pressure when an actress arrives to do research for a film about their past.
Stars: Natalie Portman, Julianne Moore, Charles Melton, Cory Michael Smith, Piper Curda, D.W. Moffett, Drew Scheid, Elizabeth Yu, Jocelyn Shelfo, Andrea Frankle, Kelvin Han Yee
Director: Todd Haynes
Rated: R
Running Length: 117 minutes
TMMM Score: (8/10)
Review: The dramatic opening credits of May December play over images of monarch butterflies recently freed from their cocoons. They signify a rebirth, the change from an original state of being into graduation to maturity, and the delicate balance struck during a pivotal time in the insect’s life. Disrupt the cycle, and the butterfly cannot emerge fully formed, stay too long inside, and that perceived ‘comfort’ equates to death. It’s much the same way with human adolescence. We grow, are nurtured to a certain point, and then leave our secure chrysalis community as adults.

While May December isn’t expressly focused on the loss of innocence, it does focus on the after-effects of it decades after it has occurred. There are painful wounds that never heal, and as much as those involved argue with terms like love and connection, the film seeks to explore the deeper meanings behind the more loaded ideas of choice and consent. I’d argue it’s deliberately flawed and often intentionally leaning into its on-the-nose melodrama/camp, but there is little doubt May December is riveting stuff. I can’t imagine two finer actors than Natalie Portman and Julianne Moore tackling this tricky material or a better director than Todd Haynes steering the ship.

It’s been twenty years since Gracie Atherton (Moore, Dear Evan Hansen) was caught in an affair with seventh grader Joe Yoo at the pet shop they both worked at. Gracie was a married mother in Savannah, Georgia, who never indicated to her husband that she was unhappy, and her betrayal of her family came with a considerable cost. Giving birth to Joe’s baby while serving a prison sentence for being involved with the underage boy, the two eventually marry when she is released. They’ve told their story countless times, had twins, and are attempting to lead an everyday life among the same people in the town where the incident occurred.

Enter Elizabeth Berry (Natalie Portman, Thor: Love and Thunder), a Hollywood actress who has signed on to play Gracie in an independent film based on the affair. It is never entirely clear why the family has authorized this movie or for Elizabeth to come to Savannah and spend several weeks getting to know Gracie, Joe, and their extended family and friends. Still, you get the feeling that money (an unfinished in-ground pool is an eyesore in the Atherton-Yoo backyard) and a need to control the narrative has something to do with it. For her part, Elizabeth has arrived with an agenda that she sets to work on immediately. 

It’s a startling movie that thrives in keeping the viewer imbalanced and, therefore, always on alert. Portman’s character is respectful to the sensitive nature of the facts of the case but unrelenting in her quest to chip away at the impenetrable glaze Gracie has painted on over herself and Joe. It becomes easier to break through with Joe (Charles Melton, Bad Boys for Life), and those cracks give Elizabeth the in she needs to push Gracie in the direction she wants. Or has Gracie been playing a bigger game of manipulation than Elizabeth could ever have known?

Haynes (Wonderstruck) has always excelled at creating death-defying tightrope acts for women in the film industry, and he’s done it again with May December. While she earned a well-deserved Oscar for Black Swan, playing a dancer who gradually gives up her scruples, her character in May December enters the action already on unsteady ground. Portman has continually pushed herself into work that challenges herself and the audience. Sometimes, as with Jackie, it works, but it could also turn into a Lucy in the Sky debacle. She’s on target here with a brilliant, brutal approach to the traditional Hollywood actress willing to go the extra mile in the name of research.

Frequent Haynes collaborator Moore is doing her best work since winning a long overdue Oscar for Still Alice. Employing a strange speech impediment that comes and goes is another fascinating layer of this character. Does she use it for dramatic effect to endear herself to the person she is talking to? Or is it something she tries to hide that she can’t cover when she is emotional? You decide. Emotionally fragile but tightly wound otherwise, Moore can turn on a dime until the final moments. 

The unenviable task of coming between the two women falls to relative newcomer Melton, and to his great credit, he trades on raw-edged talent over his good looks to be the film’s emotional core. Playing a man who had to grow up faster than anyone could have imagined, he’s a father of three, becoming an empty nester before turning forty, and leading audiences through that situation’s complexity. It gets dicey near the end when his immaturity moves to the forefront (and Haynes makes his one visual flub, an unnecessary full frontal shot of Melton) but levels off thanks to a satisfying conclusion in Samy Burch’s script.

If this all sounds eerily familiar, the elephant in the room is that May December is undoubtedly inspired by the infamous Mary Kay Letourneau case that occurred in the late ’90s. The teacher had an affair with her student, bore his children in jail, and eventually married him. Looking at pictures of Letourneau and how Haynes has recreated some of these shots with Moore, you wonder why the filmmakers didn’t lean into this angle a bit more, but Letourneau passing away in 2020 may have had something to do with that.

Laudable performances and typically skilled direction from Haynes will make this enticing to movie lovers, but May December won’t be as easily accessible as you may imagine. Yes, Portman and Moore are outstanding, and their work deserves to be seen. However, the film has strange vaults into the kind of Almodóvar-ean camp (jarringly loud music cues that don’t align with the delicate images from cinematographer Christopher Blauvelt, Showing Up) that often keep it at an aloof distance. The film frequently transfixed me, with Portman’s bewitchingly good turn in particular, but do handle this one with care.

Movie Review ~ The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes

The Facts:

Synopsis: Coriolanus Snow mentors and develops feelings for the female District 12 tribute during the 10th Hunger Games.
Stars: Tom Blyth, Rachel Zegler, Peter Dinklage, Hunter Schafer, Josh Andrés Rivera, Jason Schwartzman, Viola Davis
Director: Francis Lawrence
Rated: PG-13
Running Length: 157 minutes
TMMM Score: (8/10)
Review: For movie audiences, The Hunger Games concluded eight years ago with The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2. It was the second part of an epic finale to a series that, in four short years, had taken the box office by storm. These well-made, serious-minded films used their bleak dystopia to a skilled advantage, aided by emotionally charged performances by a top-notch cast of A-listers. Led by Jennifer Lawrence (who would win an Oscar for Silver Linings Playbook between the first two films), the cast added new faces here and there but largely benefitted from the perfect casting in the original movie.

Of course, fans of the original trilogy of novels by Suzanne Collins weren’t surprised to see the films take off like a rocket. Published between 2008-2010, these were books you could quickly devour in one or two sittings and read like a movie. I consumed them all in a week, far before the films arrived, before I could even imagine how a Hollywood studio would bring the brutal violence of Collins’s prose into PG-13 reality. Like their cinematic counterparts, the books did well with not glamorizing the atrocities surrounding the simple set-ups of The Hunger Games.

Ten years after Collins put down her pen, she returned to the world she created for a prequel, published in 2020 when the world was locked away for the pandemic. Not ideal for releasing a movie, but perfect for eyes craving a new book to crack open. The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes is set 64 years before the first novel’s events and is centered around the 10th annual Hunger Games, an infamously vague year in the history of the battle royale. 

Told in three parts from the perspective of Coriolanus Snow (who would grow up to become the nefarious President Snow we first met in the previous trilogy), a student in his final year of school and assigned along with other members of his class to mentor one of the district tributes, the novel followed along as his ambitions for a higher position in the Capitol become waylaid when he develops feelings for his mentee. Lucy Gray Baird may be “district,” but she exudes a magical aura that transfixes Snow and convinces him that love could conquer their social divide and usurp his dreams of prosperity and authority.

In the film version, returning director Francis Lawrence uses a faithful adaptation by playwright Michael Lesslie and Michael Arndt (Star Wars: The Force Awakens) to breathe life back into a world we had left behind. Now half a century earlier, many things are different in the Capitol, and the film moves at a brisk pace into the action of Snow (Tom Blyth, Benediction) first laying eyes on Lucy (Rachel Zegler, West Side Story) and making the decision to treat her as a human and not chattel for the arena. Often thwarted by classmates, school leadership (Peter Dinklage, She Came to Me, is fun as a conniving Dean out to melt Snow’s good fortune), an enigmatic game maker (Viola Davis, The Woman King), and other rebel forces working from their own agenda, Snow must use his cunning acumen to outplay his competitors and ensure Lucy’s survival. But when does cunning become conniving, and how long can Snow pull the wool over everyone’s eyes, even his own?

Like the book, the first two parts of The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes moves at breakneck speed. Snow is charmed by Lucy and earns her trust, an unwavering loyalty that only gets muddy in an overstuffed third act. While Collins can work through a lot of plot via internal thought in this third part, the screenwriters can only do so much, and it’s up to Lawrence, Blyth, and Zegler to keep up with the necessary exposition. It’s nothing that devastates the film or its overall impact, but even if you hadn’t read the book, I think you’ll feel how frantic the action starts to feel by the finale.

In her second leading role after West Side Story, Zegler demonstrates again why she’s a bona fide star on the rise. True, the part of the soulful singing Lucy seems like it was written with her in mind, but beyond that, Zegler finds small moments throughout to show off a gift for diving into her emotional well. The voice is also warm, full-bodied, utterly different from what we heard her do as Maria in Steven Spielberg’s 2021 remake of the classic Broadway musical. Blyth makes a strong case for his take on the role as well. Playing a young Donald Sutherland and rather convincingly, it is often easy to forget that Snow isn’t the good guy in this (or any) Hunger Games movie. It’s told from his perspective, but that doesn’t make him the one to root for. 

Going down the board, Lawrence has filled out his cast with talented faces, some we recognize and some just getting going. Zegler’s West Side Story co-star Josh Andrés Rivera has the perfect sensitive sincerity for Sejanus Plinth, a mentor that transplanted from the districts and feels conflicted about his role. Various young actors make up Snow’s class, and I wondered what a movie that focused on the early years of their schooling would be like. We can’t overlook Jason Schwartzman (Quiz Lady) or his creative work that isn’t just laying the groundwork for the indelible character Stanley Tucci created in the preceding films.

If we’re being honest, though, Davis walks away with the movie playing the sinister and kooky Dr. Volumnia Gaul. Davis is having the absolute time of her life here, sporting a wig that bounces when she walks and an ice-blue, all-seeing contact lens in one eye. Every line reading is dripping with a thick sugar syrup that can sting, and every stare she levels could freeze any of the Great Lakes before she had time to blink. Yet Davis never lets the role, the make-up, or the wacky costumes get in the way of her phenomenal acting of the part either. Take all those extra layers away; the role would be just as unnerving.

At almost two hours and forty-five minutes, The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes is a big movie, and I’m glad the studio didn’t lose their minds and break this up into two parts. The film flies by and provides a satisfyingly epic amount of entertainment, one that fans of the novel (or the original series) will be pleased with. I’m not sure if Collins has more stories from this world left to tell, but if Lionsgate, Lawrence, or any of the actors involved so far want to volunteer their time again, I’d happily donate more time to this well-built arena.

Movie Review ~ Next Goal Wins

1

The Facts:

Synopsis: The story of the infamously terrible American Samoa soccer team, known for a brutal 2001 FIFA match they lost 31-0.
Stars: Michael Fassbender, Elisabeth Moss, Oscar Kightley, Uli Latukefu, Rachel House, Kaimana, David Fane, Beulah Koale, Chris Alosio, Taika Waititi, Will Arnett, Rhys Darby
Director: Taika Waititi
Rated: PG-13
Running Length: 103 minutes
TMMM Score: (3/10)
Review: There’s nothing that a packed theater loves more than getting behind a good underdog.  An electric zing rushes over the crowd when our vested interest gets that much closer to success.  So, I can understand why the early audiences for Next Goal Wins at the Toronto International Film Festival came out of their screenings buzzing.  Much like 1993’s Cool Runnings (which is frequently similar in story and structure), the inspiring story of American Samoa’s bid to pull itself up from last place in the World Cup rankings deserves its say on film, there’s no doubt about it. 

Unfortunately, Next Goal Wins is not the movie to do it.  I’m pretty sure co-writer/director Taika Waititi’s latest is actively bad for much of its 105 minutes, this despite a last-ditch rally cry that only amounts to a modicum of audience rousing, likely to prepare them with enough energy to gather their belongings and go home.  For a movie about community, it’s an isolating experience to sit through.  That’s mainly because Waititi doesn’t know how to handle interpersonal drama as well as he does absurd humor. By the time I got around to seeing it, on one of the final days of the festival, it was hard to drum up much enthusiasm for such mechanical entertainment.

Opening with Waititi (Thor: Love and Thunder) himself in a ridiculous cameo as a mystic priest that introduces the characters and acts as an irritating semi-narrator, we meet Thomas Rongen (Michael Fassbender, The Killer), a Dutch soccer coach who has seen better days.  About to lose his footing in the world of Association football, he’s given a final reprieve: become the coach of the American Samoa team and stop their losing streak.  If they don’t turn things around, he’ll be out of a job, and the South Pacific territory will lose their right to have an officially recognized team.

Rongen accepts the job out of desperation and arrives on the island with a gigantic chip on his shoulder, made worse by the rural locale and the sorry state of his team.  Rongen doesn’t want to be there, and the players don’t believe in themselves enough because no one has lit a flame of inspiration for them.  As with all sports movies, it only takes time for the coach and players to learn from one another, but it’s an uphill climb.  With the season moving forward and different issues with players changing his outlook, Rongen will make professional gains with the team…but will it be enough to score a more significant victory for them all?

Fassbender looks bored and is badly miscast (and knows it) in Next Goal Wins, and you wish the far more appealing American Samoan cast were truly the stars.  This should be a story about the team first and foremost.  Instead, it’s a laboriously formulaic slog through an obnoxious knob’s redemptive arc that has nothing new to add to the sports/underdog genre.  Worst of all, and more people praising the movie need to note this, the way Waititi’s script handles a non-binary trans woman (played with grace by the mononymous Kaimana) is so backward-facing from a 2023 viewpoint that you’ll be looking for a DeLorean to help you find your way home.